| |
Over
the past several years, many attempts have been made to solve the
problems of providing high quality education to children of poverty
by sending experts to study the problems and provide assistance
to those who work with these children.
The
Francis Marion University Center of Excellence to Prepare
Teachers of Children of Poverty operates from a completely
different perspective. Rather than relying on external expertise,
the Center works to solve the problems inherent in educating children
of poverty by developing expertise in those that work with these
children on a daily basis. Only through developing local capacity
to solve problems will true progress be made in the struggle to
help those in greatest need -- children of poverty.
More
specifically, the purpose of the Center of Excellence to
Prepare Teachers of Children of Poverty is to increase
the achievement of children of poverty by improving the quality
of undergraduate teacher preparation, graduate teacher preparation,
and the professional development of in-service teachers. The
primary activities to be completed during the life of the Center
include: (1) revising the undergraduate teacher education program,
based on best practice research and practitioner insights, (2) training
teachers in the conduct and use of research to increase their ability
to make data-based decisions, (3) linking research directly with
professional development, (4) helping teachers understand parents
who live in poverty and the community resources that are available
to them, and (5) seeking state certification for graduates of a
to-be-developed Master’s Degree program in an effort to elevate
the status of teachers of children of poverty.
The work
of the FMU Center of Excellence has been made possible through a
five-year grant awarded by the South Carolina Commission on Higher
Education. Centers of Excellence in South Carolina are funded through
the Education Improvement Act of 1984 [http://www.che400.state.sc.us/web/affairs].
Rationale
for the FMU Center of Excellence
The Pee
Dee region of South Carolina is an eight-county area located in
the northeastern section of the state between the Piedmont and Coastal
regions. These eight counties contain 18 school districts -- four
counties with one district, three with three districts, and one
with five districts. The total student enrollment of these districts
is slightly more 65,000 students. The districts range in size from
an enrollment of just under 900 to an enrollment of just under 14,000.
Despite the size differences, these districts share one thing in
common: significant pockets of poverty.
About
five years ago, the South Carolina Education Oversight Committee
developed a poverty index that is a composite of the percent of
students in each district who are eligible for Medicaid services
and/or those who qualify for free or reduced-price meals. A poverty
index of 90.0, for example, means that 90% of the students are eligible
for Medicaid services, qualify for free or reduced-price meals,
or both. Thus, higher indices indicate greater poverty. For the
18 districts in the Pee Dee region, the median poverty index is
78.9%. Statewide, the median poverty index is 65.7%. Ten of the
18 districts rank in the highest quarter of districts statewide
in terms of the poverty index. For these counties, the range of
poverty indices is from 82.9% to 94.7%.
Numerous studies both in South Carolina and nation-wide have linked
poverty with student achievement. On the 2003 District Report Card,
eight of the 18 districts received absolute ratings of Below Average
(n = 7) or Unsatisfactory (n = 1). The other ten districts received
absolute ratings of Average or Good. There were no ratings of Excellent.
More troubling, however, were the districts improvement ratings.
Seven of the 18 districts received improvement ratings of Unsatisfactory,
with three more districts receiving improvement ratings of Below
Average. Only two districts received improvement ratings of Good
and there were no improvement ratings of Excellent. These low improvement
ratings, coupled with a recent analysis of three-year longitudinal
achievement data conducted by the South Carolina Education Oversight
Committee, suggest that, not only do students in these districts
not learn at high levels, but they fall further behind their peers
the longer they are in school.
Cognizant of this situation and aware of the fact that one of the
factors - perhaps the single greatest factor - involved in improving
student learning is the quality of the classroom teacher, the South
Carolina Commission on Higher Education (CHE) issued a Request for
Proposals (RFP) to establish a Center of Excellence for the improvement
of teacher education. The RFP is unique in that it focuses on the
preparation and ongoing professional development of teachers who
work or intend to work in low-performing schools and districts -
schools and districts like those in the Pee Dee region.
This
high concentration of poverty in a single geographic area provides
both a challenge and an opportunity. Located near the geographic
center of the Pee Dee region, Francis Marion University (FMU) is
ready to face that challenge and take advantage of that opportunity.
In addition to geographic location, there are other reasons that
FMU is uniquely qualified to house a Center of Excellence for the
Preparation of Teachers to Teach Children of Poverty.
First, FMU is the only state university serving the Pee Dee region.
Second, over 90 percent of its almost 4,000 students come from South
Carolina, with the majority of those coming from the eight counties
that comprise the Pee Dee region. Third, many of the students who
enroll at FMU are the first in their families to attend college.
Fourth, because of its long-time relationship with the Pee
Dee Education Center, FMU is already part of a regional infrastructure
serving schools in neighboring counties. Finally, a Center for Excellence
for the Preparation of Teachers to Teach Children of Poverty is
consistent with the mission of FMU. Its mission statement states,
in part, that the University "seeks to serve as a catalyst
for regional development. Faculty, staff members, and advanced students
… render academic and practical assistance to regional schools
and other organizations [in an effort to build] a better educated,
more culturally enriched, and more prosperous region."
Benefit to K-12 Districts/Schools
The
benefits are immediate and on-going. Superintendents from all "partner
districts" have written letters of support for the Center.
By participating as "partners" in the Center, the districts:
- are
involved in the development of new teacher preparation programs
that improve the quality of their novice teachers;
- have
experienced teachers who are better trained in the design, conduct,
and use of action research to improve the teaching-learning process;
- are
able to work jointly with FMU faculty and educators from neighboring
districts to solve the long-standing problems of providing quality
education to children of poverty; and,
- are
able to establish more meaningful and beneficial relationships
between schools, parents, and communities, using community resources
to benefit their students.
Benefits to the "participating school districts" will
be similar, although these benefits will begin to accrue in Years
4 and 5.
|
|